According to IDC, the consolidated global telecom industry capital expenditure (CAPEX) of US$292.7 billion in the year
2020 has been diverted partially from network expansion to upgrade existing network capacity which will cater to
increasing demand for data consumption. Furthermore, operators such as AT&T, China Mobile, China Telecom and
Verizon have announced additional budgets of up to US$500 million in total to manage evolving demands due to the
pandemic.Verizon increased its capital expenditure to 24% year-on-year (YoY) to support high traffic growth across
its networks, and has deployed fiber and additional cell sites to expand the its 5G network.
There is on-going investment in optical fiber since next-generation telecommunication technologies like fiber-to-the-x
(FTTX) and 5G require this transmission medium to carry terabytes of data. Optical fiber is obviously an enabler in the
evolution of the telecommunication network, and it is imperative that CSPs select the ideal optical fiber to protect
their network investments and ensure that their networks can deliver advanced telecommunication technologiesin
the coming future.
Network Infrastructure Transformation: One Fiber Type for All
The most commonly-used single-mode optical fiber forterrestrial network deployment is ITU-T G.652.D optical fiber,
also known as legacy optical fiber. Legacy optical fiber has been deployed in both long-haultransmission and shorthaul access networksfor almost two decades. As technology evolved, opticalfiber applications extended into the
customer premise, especially with the introduction of GPON/EPONand Metro-Ethernet technology-related services.
Installation of optical fiber into customer premises at both residential and business sites with legacy optical fiber has
disadvantages due to its bending limitations. Theminimumallowable bending radius of legacy optical fiber is 30mm
and sharp bends or cornerswithin customer premiseswill introduce macrobend, extrinsic optical loss which further
increasesthe total link loss for the network
ITU-T G.657 optical fiber was introduced to eliminate the bending limitation issue at last-mile installations and due to
its bend-insensitive capability, it is known as bend-insensitive optical fiber. The standard types of optical fiber used by
CSPsfor last-mile installation are mainly bend-insensitive ITU-T G.657.A1 and ITU-T G.657.A2. The former has a
bending radius of 10mm,while the latter has a smaller bending radius, of 7.5mm.
Maintaining two different types of optical fiber in telecommunication networks has some drawbacks for CSPssince
joining (splicing) of the fibers will create higher splice loss due to mode field diameter (MFD) mismatch. From Table 1,
it is evident that different types of opticalfiber have different ranges of MFDs and thus, cross-splicing these optical fibers results in a mismatch between the fibers,which willrequire additional optical testing to ascertain the exact
TABLE 1:Mode Field Diameter for Different Types of Optical Fiber
The concern for the fiber technician is that they cannot distinguish the type of optical fiber with the naked eye, and
this will result in them treating all these opticalfibers the same way. This practice would increase the chances of
cross-splicing occurring between two different types of optical fibers.
Bend-insensitive optical fiber was primarily designed for last-mile installationsin access networks,focusing on
customer premise installations. Later, applicationsfor bend-insensitive optical fiber extended to both access and
transport networks, where legacy optical fiber has been widely used. Designing and deploying telecommunication
networks by selecting bend-insensitive optical fiber for both access (short haul) and transport (long haul) networks
will not only avoid the MFD mismatch which causes higher splice loss, but will at the same time give better bending
performance for the network, and reduce macrobend losses that exist in fiber optic splice closures and other fiber
Moreover, implementing bend-insensitive optical fiber for telecom network infrastructure will extend the lifetime of
the network since undesirable optical losses incurred due to macrobend will be drastically reduced. This practice will
become a bufferforthe additional losses that will be introduced due to any repair works that happen throughout the
lifetime of the network.
In summary, deploying access and transport networkswith a single type of optical fiber that is bend-insensitive
providesthe CSPwith several advantages:
- Better bending performance and reducedmacrobend loss.
- AvoidsMFD mismatch and reduces high splice loss.
- Extendsthe lifespan of network infrastructure.
Modernizing the Fiber Network
Optical fiber is both flexible and fragile since it is made of silica (glass). The bare optical fiber cannot be installed,
especially in outdoor environments,without proper protection. Multiple strands of optical fiber are encapsulated by
cables for protection and easy application deployment.
Different kinds of cables have been designed for various applications and installation scenarios. The contemporary
types of cablesthat are used by CSPsfor their telecommunication networks are:
- All-dielectric self-supporting (ADSS) cables
- Micro cables
- Ribbon fiber cables
ADSS cableshave been introduced for applications on the electrical grid since they do not have any metallic
components as part of the cable structure.ADSS cables can also be used in both overhead and underground telecom
network infrastructure, especially in brownfield areas.Applications of this cable in both scenarioswill simplify
inventory management since one type of cable could be used for both aerial and underground installation.
Furthermore, there is no need to ground such cablesfor aerial installation since they lack metallic parts. This saves
costs for network infrastructure providers during the network deployment stage.
While ADSS cables have been widely applied in brownfield scenarios, the miniature version of loose tube cables –
micro cables – are designed to be considered for greenfield areas. A greenfield area like a new township could have
proper infrastructure planning that includesmicroduct installations as part of town planning. With proper planning
and availability of microducts, micro cables can be installed at a relatively fast pace and additionally, provide easy
scalability to the networkwhen the time comes for expansion of the connectivity infrastructure. Blowing machines
and skilled technicians are required to conduct micro-cable installations.
It is very common to see the optical fiber come in a single strand.Jointing a 96-optical fiber cable requires 96 splices at
each jointing point. For long-haul transport network deployment, this effort could be very time-consuming and costly.
Ribbon fiber, where the opticalfibers are aligned and bonded together in a group of 4, 8, 12, or 16 optical fibers,will
help CSPs to complete the splicing work much faster.
If there are any cable-cut issues, the maintenance team could minimize the time needed to restore the network,
reducing network downtime. Feedback received from network contractors regarding ribbon fiber cable deployment
isthat they need to invest in ribbon splicing machines, but it is a one-time investment and they will recover the cost
quickly as they can do more installationsin a day.
Total cost of ownership (TCO) calculations during the planning stage will assist CSPs to decide the right cable and
optical fiber type for their network infrastructure. Understanding the features of available optical fiber cables and the
selection of the cable based on applications and deployment scenarios during the planning stage will help CSPs to
optimize their network installation cost.
TABLE 2:The Advantages and Typical Applications of Various Optical Fiber Cables
Future-Proofing Telecom Infrastructure
When it comes to optical fiber and cabling, Sterlite Technologies Limited (STL) is one of relatively few players whose
portfolio is positioned as future-proofed telecom infrastructure. The company provides integrated 5G ready end-toend solutions,ranging from wired to wireless, design to deployment, connectivity to compute through core
capabilities in optical interconnect, virtualized access solutions, network software and system integration.
The company designs and manufactures optical fiber and optical fiber cable solutions. With expertise ranging from
optical fiber and cables,hyper-scale network design, as well as deployment and network software,the company is
the industry's integrated solutions provider for global data networks.
Stellar optical fiber
STL’s Stellar fiberis the next-generation optical fiber that blends the benefits of both legacy and bend-insensitive
optical fibers. It has a MFD that matches the MFD oflegacy optical fiberwhile at the same time, featuressimilar bendinsensitivity characteristics to ITU-T G.657A1 andG.657A2 optical fiber.
Deploying Stellar optical fiber will solve the MFD mismatch problem since it is legacy-compatible optical fiber and will
enable CSPstomaintain legacy optical fiber in their networks. In other words, there will be no high-splice loss in the
fiber network due to a MFDmismatch using Stellar optical fiber.
A study conducted by STL found that using Stellar fiber can potentially increase the life span of networks by an
additional 10 years since the network will have a buffer against future optical losses due to network repairwork.
Building telecommunication network infrastructure is considered a huge challenge and involvessignificant
expenditure from CSPs, which can make them cautious about investing in relatively new albeit innovative
technologies, even if there is proven return on investment (RoI). CSPs also fear a scenario of ‘overbuilding’ passive
network capacity to cater for projected future network demand in case of those predictions go awry. While STL will
have to face this hesitancy from potential customers, the opportunity for the company lies in highlighting the:
- Availability of alternative types of optical fibers and cables: Most of CSPs’ attention during network planning
has been focused on the active elements in the network. Conducting exploration and trial sessionswith
different types of optical fiber and cables would help to show them the advantages of bend-insensitive optical
fibers and various types of optical fiber cables.
- Building future-ready networks: Optical fiber cable accountsfor about 10 % to 15% of a typical network
infrastructure cost, other cost components being CAPEX for cable installation, electronic hardware and
software. Deployment of higher fiber count cableswith the right choice of optical fibertoday will require a
marginal increase in the network investment cost at the current rates but will deliver the twin benefits of not
only making networks ready for future demand, but also enable significant savings in future network upgrade
- Impact of optical fibers and cables on the lifetime of the network: Settling for lower-price optical fiber and
cables to reduce the CAPEX component of network infrastructure cost will result in the procurement of poorquality optical fiber and cablesthat will reduce the lifetime of the network in the long run. This will also increase
the OPEX of the network as frequent maintenance work will be needed.
IDC recommends that CSPsselect their optical fiber and cable construction of choice carefully. They should consider
the ideal optical fiber and type for:
- Faster network deployment:Quick installation will allow CSPs to accelerate
their go-to-market strategy within their coverage area.
- Ease of maintenance: Reducesthe impact of downtime during any breakdown
or repair of the network, and eventually maintains customer satisfaction of the
connectivity service rendered to subscribers.
- Future-proofing telecommunication networks: Providesscalability for the
network when infrastructure upgrade work is required in future.
- Protecting network investment: Increasing the life expectancy of the network
will reduce the operational expenses(OPEX)for network maintenance.
About the Analysts
Nikhil Batra, Associate Research Director
Nikhil Batra is the Associate Research Director for the regional telecommunications team in IDC Asia/Pacific.
Based in Australia, Nikhil focuses on Telecom Service Provider and tech vendor strategies, along with
enterprise services across the A/P region. In his role, Nikhil works with the regional telecom teams to
produce intelligence reports, market insights, and contributes to various consulting projects for leading
regional telcos and tech vendors.
Zaim Halil, Senior Research Manager
Zaim Halil is the senior research manager for telecommunication and Internet of Things (IoT) and is
responsible for business development, delivery of custom and syndicated research, and expansion of the
IDC telecom brand across the ASEAN region.
MESSAGE FROM THE SPONSOR
STL -Digital Networks Integrator
With experience spanning over two decades in leading the evolution of optical fibers, introducing game-changing
products and solutions, and steering global enterprises through their digital journey, STL is a pathbreaker not only in
identifying all the challenges CSPs face but also in driving innovation to build adequate and agile solutions. In the
current times of dramatic increase in data consumption and rapidly transforming lifestyles, STL’s research team is
continuously building integrated network infrastructure solutions to drive network optimization and agility for CSPs.
Their focus is on optimum capital outlays and shorter turnaround timelines on one hand, and network interoperability
and efficiency on the other. Additionally, their constant goal is to make networks smarter, enable faster deployment
using cost-effective processes and technologies.
Stellar™ is one such breakthrough technology that allows CSPs a smart solution to densify the network with superior
performing cables, improving capacity and coverage thereby making it future-ready and facilitating 5G / FTTX
deployments. It optimizes costs and negates/minimizes future redundancies. It, therefore, builds both for the present
and for the future.
Click here to know more about Stellar™.